ERIC Logo

Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management

College of Education · University of Oregon

Home Trends and Issues Hot Topics In-Process Abstracts Publications Directory of Organizations Search CEPM Web Site Links About CEPM

   
 

Menu Image for publications
 
Publications Index Page Books and Monographs Brows
e Publications ERIC Digests Forthcoming Publications How to Order News Bulletins Policy Perspective Policy Reports Problem Based Learning Publications Available Online Research Roundups Search Publications

 

Why Dress Codes and Why Now?

Arguments for dress codes and uniforms policies stress school safety.

If you were to ask administrators and teachers to prioritize a list of concerns, what children wear to school would likely be ranked low, below funding, school violence, and even what color to paint the walls of the staff lounge. So why all the fuss about dress codes and uniform policies?

Clearly, as Lumsden (2001) pointed out, it is naive to think of a dress code or uniform policy as the sole solution to the problems that plague schools. Nevertheless, a well-conceived dress code coupled with other appropriate interventions could have a positive impact on a school’s social environment.

Supporters of dress codes or uniform policies have compiled a long list of the perceived advantages of standardized dress in the classroom.The list can be shortened to four basic benefits:

  1. Enhanced school safety
  2. Improved learning climate
  3. Higher self-esteem for students
  4. Less stress on the family

Safety First

A sincere concern with safety has been the overriding impetus toward the implementation of dress codes and uniform policies. Many educators, and also people in the community, firmly believe that if everyone in school dresses alike, or at least dresses similarly, there will be less violence. There is a general perception that most students will behave the way they are allowed to dress.

Supporters of regulated dress maintain there is a definite connection between clothing styles and school violence. For many students, an image—or sometimes stigma—is attached to certain styles, most notably gang-style clothing. Students have become targets of intentional or unintentional violence simply for wearing a particular type of shirt or cap or color combination affiliated with a particular gang (King 1998).

A popular style, especially with boys, is baggy pants and oversized shirts. This style is closely associated with inner-city gang members, who wear the loose-fitting clothes to better hide weapons and drugs, which can also be carried into schools. “Add to this the finding that one in three youth reports easy access to handguns, and the concern for school safety becomes especially crucial” (King 1998).

Curbing gang-related problems was the primary goal of the Long Beach (CA) Unified School District (LBUSD) when it established its pioneering districtwide uniform policy in 1994.

“Gangsta” is not the only style linked to violence. After the Columbine shootings, a certain stigma was attached to students wearing black trench coats, all black clothing, or black lipstick and eye shadow. Many school dress codes banned black clothing and makeup. Ronald Stephens, executive director of the National School Safety Center, stated, “In the wake of school shootings, communities and schools are much more willing to embrace uniforms as well as a number of other strategies to enhance student safety” (in White 2000).

Even seemingly ordinary fashions can invite violence. Children have been robbed of their expensive shoes and killed for simply wearing the wrong jacket:

Children’s hunger to be fashionable brings another dimension to the connection between clothing styles and school violence. Children may envy other children’s clothing and lack the financial resources to purchase similar styles. Subsequently, children have been violently injured or even murdered for their designer clothes, sneakers, or professional sport-team paraphernalia. School uniforms may reduce these occurrences. (King 1998)

Furthermore, requiring students to dress alike could send the message that they are all on the same team. Viewing their fellow students as “teammates,” they should be less likely to commit acts of bullying or other kinds of violence against one another.

Enhanced Performance

Students who feel safe, secure, and free from threats of violence naturally perform better academically. Enhancing academic performance is another argument in favor of adopting dress codes or uniform policies.

Proponents believe that dress codes in general and uniforms in particular help students focus on their schoolwork, instead of on what they and others are wearing.

Dress codes prohibit the wearing of clothing that could be disruptive. As the director of a charter school said, “It doesn’t bother me to say that we ban bare midriffs in our school not because we think they are vulgar or offensive.... We ban bare midriffs because we see them as unwelcome and unnecessary distractions that can divert too much student attention from the serious intellectual work we’re here to do together” (Northrop 2002).

Uniforms set the tone for a proper attitude toward work. Uniforms remind students that they are in school to learn, not to make a fashion statement.

Other potential benefits attributed to uniforms that help enhance performance include improved discipline, increased respect for teachers, increased school attendance, fewer distractions, and improved classroom behavior (Lumsden 2001).

Peer Pressure

Dressing for success is a practice witnessed not only in the office but also in the classroom. A flair for fashion has always paid big dividends. Clothes do make the man, or woman. “Middle school students can sometimes be cruel. If a child does not have the ‘right’ brand or style of clothing, students can make life very difficult for that student” (Kahl 1997).

By removing the status that clothing labels accord some children, a uniform becomes a great equalizer. A uniform also conceals the income of a child’s family, thus eliminating another mark of distinction or shame. An attractive uniform promotes school spirit and good self-image, just as athletic team uniforms promote spirit and unity. By eliminating the preoccupation of status brought about by dress, proponents say, students can find more productive and creative outlets to express their individualism.

No child should become a Barbie or Ken doll to dress and undress according to the style of the month. With children, we really ought to hold on to some conservative old certainties—for example, the notion that how you dress is ultimately far less important than what and how you think. That’s one message school systems send when they require school uniforms. (Northrop 2002)

Family Values

When dress codes or uniform policies are instituted, many families realize an immediate benefit: not having to buy so many expensive clothes for their fashion-conscious children. Some comparisons show that the cost of uniforms is significantly less than the cost of the latest fashions.

Many parents also welcome dress codes and uniforms because they bring added peace to the home. If what their children wear to school is predetermined, it becomes one less battle to fight in the morning.

Kristi Kahl, who was a middle-school teacher during the first year of the implementation of the uniform policy at Long Beach USD, spoke of another hidden benefit to the family, as well as to the school:

Do uniforms generate parent participation? I believe they have. It is certainly something that almost everyone loves to talk about (whether they are pro or con)! I think that our teachers and site administrators have had the opportunity to meet parents who, without questions about the uniforms, might not have contacted the school. This allows conversations about other deep issues to develop. (Kahl 1997)

SIDEBAR

Advantages of a Standard Dress Code

In 2001, the Clarksville-Montgomery County (TN) School System surveyed the local community concerning dress-code issues. Results of the survey revealed the following perceived advantages:

  • Diminishes exclusion of students based on what they are wearing.
  • Places stronger focus on academic performance.
  • Decreases opportunity for showing gang affiliation or hiding weapons.
  • Reduces family tension; saves time in the morning.
  • Decreases participation in violent activity.
  • Leads to higher academic performance.
  • Creates atmosphere of teamwork and pride in personal appearance and school.
  • Promotes safety; makes it easier to identify strangers in schools.
  • Increases self-esteem and reduces peer pressure.
  • Most cost effective to parents in the long run.
  • Reduces absenteeism.
  • Puts students on a more common ground.
  • Reduces discrepancies in administering dress-code justice.

SIDEBAR

Viewpoints

“I think you’re going to see an increased emphasis on more standardized dress escalating as a result of Littleton.” —Paul Houston, executive director, American Association of School Administrators

“Uniforms have been a great equalizer for our students and have been wonderful both in terms of unity and discipline within the school and cost effectiveness for the parents.”
—Connie Jo Gamble, principal, Loxley Elementary, Loxley, Alabama

“Many families in our school really support our switch to uniforms. They say it’s easier and less expensive, and that the children look nicer. It also takes the attention off what someone else is wearing and solves the question, ‘What am I going to wear today?’”
—Nancy Dickerson, principal, Mattahunt Elementary, Boston, Massachusetts

Home Trends and Issues Hot Topics In-Process Abstracts Publications Directory of Organizations Search CEPM Web Site Links About CEPM