ERIC Logo

Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management

College of Education · University of Oregon

Home Trends and Issues Hot Topics In-Process Abstracts Publications Directory of Organizations Search CEPM Web Site Links About CEPM

   
 

Menu Image for publications
 
Publications Index Page Books and Monographs Brows
e Publications ERIC Digests Forthcoming Publications How to Order News Bulletins Policy Perspective Policy Reports Problem Based Learning Publications Available Online Research Roundups Search Publications

  ERIC/CEM Information
Spring 2001
University of Oregon - Eugene

The Accountability Movement Seeks To Motivate Educators To Produce Better Results

Will It Succeed?

There is no question about it: The times they are a changing. "Whereas it was once sufficient to run an orderly, well-organized school with qualified teachers and up-to-date curriculum, it now appears as though results will be the universal yardstick of leadership," notes Larry Lashway in his latest book, The New Standards and Accountability: Will Rewards and Sanctions Motivate America’s Schools to Peak Performance?

The nation’s public schools are increasingly expected to produce results. Although most people heartily support the idea of having some means in place to assess whether schools are achieving their mission, agreement disappears quickly when discussion turns to what the outcomes of education should be. Different stakeholders and constituents hold widely disparate views.

As Lashway notes, multiple perspectives and clashing agendas abound when policymakers turn their attention to accountability, an issue that "has raised fundamental questions about school effectiveness, institutional reform, and human motivation."

In the course of researching and writing this groundbreaking book, Lashway–a teacher and administrator who has written several books and numerous other publications for the Clearinghouse on leadership issues–asked himself: "In a profession devoted to the long-term growth of hearts and minds, what could count as measurable results?" This question, in turn, stimulates a series of others, such as

• Who is accountable and to what extent? (Teachers? School leaders? Students? Parents?)

• Accountable to whom? (Students? Parents? State officials? Employers?)

• Accountable how?

• Accountable for how long? (Until accountability demands denying students diplomas or letting incompetent teachers go?)

• And, perhaps most important, How does human motivation enter into the accountability equation?

Lashway’s insightful discussion of how human motivation is intimately tied to the ultimate success (or failure) of the accountability movement clearly sets this book apart from others. The book serves two complementary purposes.

On the one hand, Lashway succeeds masterfully in his goal of providing school and district leaders, teachers, policymakers, and others with a concise, conceptually clear overview of the literature on standards and accountability. On the other hand, woven throughout his sweeping analysis of the accountability movement and its five parts–standards, assessment, public reporting, incentives, and professional development–is a lucid explanation of what is known about human motivation.

Lashway draws from this knowledge about motivation as he seeks to find out "why all the human effort that goes into a typical school day so often fails to produce the results we want. Can we be sure that a standards-driven accountability system will stimulate student and teacher effort in a productive way?"

Specifically, Lashway discusses how school leaders can build motivational systems that support and enhance the higher standards expected of today’s schools. He pays particular attention to the role of the principal in helping schools to successfully integrate new external standards with existing internal initiatives.

In chapter 1, Lashway presents a concise overview of some of the challenges and complexities inherent in the accountability movement. Chapter 2 explains three perspectives on human motivation–each illuminating dimensions ignored by the others–and then examines teachers’ motivational structures.

Eight types of standards are discussed in chapter 3, where Lashway explores three questions relevant to practitioners: (1) How should standards be developed and/or chosen? (2) What instructional changes will the new standards require? And (3) What support systems must be in place for standards to have an impact?

Chapter 4 presents arguments for and against testing, provides a synthesis of basic assessment principles, and discusses the relationship between assessment and motivation. As Lashway notes, "The new system requires clear standards and a way of measuring whether those standards have been met." Such feedback can sometimes be painful, however: Although "virtually everyone takes for granted that testing should be a part of accountability… when the results strike close to home, many are ready to disregard the results as somehow inadmissible."

The focus in chapter 5 is on performance indicators. Lashway reviews various types of performance indicators and discusses how to collect, interpret, and present school-performance data in ways that are meaningful and informative. He also describes how to use data to improve schools and shows how public reporting of data by schools may serve as "motivational fuel" that contributes to the school-improvement process.

Specific types of incentives and sanctions and their ability to strengthen behavior that leads to targeted outcomes among students, teachers, and schools are discussed in chapter 6. Among subjects covered are promotion policies and graduation incentives for students, monetary incentives for teachers, skill-based compensation, pay-for-performance plans, state takeovers, and school reconstitution. Wherever possible, Lashway spells out guidelines and models for appropriate use of these rewards and sanctions.

Chapter 7 looks at how principals can help their schools "find the balance between external and internal standards" and build capacity for improvement by supporting teacher learning. Lashway examines practice-based learning, learning communities, structuring a school for teacher learning, and strategies to free up time for professional development.

Lashway notes, "Only by respecting the human needs of students can schools become the kinds of institutions we want them to be. Even in an age of state mandates, school leaders must find a way to build autonomous communities of learning."

Chapter 8 summarizes the progress to date of standards-based accountability, points out questions still waiting for answers, and lists the challenges facing school leaders. The evidence, Lashway concludes, suggests that standards-based accountability has a future. "The fact policymakers have managed to get fifty state bureaucracies headed in approximately the same direction at the same time is an astonishing achievement, and it attests to the depth of the public’s desire to make the system work."

This book is an essential resource for school and district leaders as they labor to make their organizations change with the times.

To order The New Standards and Accountability, see the form on page 4.

CHAPTERS

Chapter 1--The Accountability Challenge

Chapter 2--Understanding Human Motivation

Chapter 3--Educational Standards

Chapter 4--Assessment

Chapter 5--Use of Performance Data: Indicators and School Report Cards

Chapter 6--Incentives: Motivating by Rewards and Sanctions

Chapter 7--Building Capacity for Improvement

Chapter 8--Conclusion: Unanswered Questions and Leadership Imperatives

Subject and Author Indexes

Let Us Disseminate Your Work

If you have authored a book, research report, survey, bibliography, speech, or any other material that you consider worthy of dissemination to a nationwide audience of educators, we’d appreciate your sending us two copies so we can consider the document for inclusion in the ERIC database.

To be accepted for processing, a document must meet certain criteria. First, it must fall within the Clearinghouse’s scope. ERIC/CEM’s subject area is the governance, policy, leadership, administration, and management of K-12 public and private schools. Second, the document must meet various quality tests such as contribution to knowledge, significance, and currency.

If one of your submissions is selected for inclusion in the ERIC database, it will be indexed and abstracted by our staff. You will be notified when our processing work is finished (typically four to six weeks). Several months later, the document will be announced in Resources in Education (RIE), ERIC’s monthly index and abstract catalog. After the acquisitions process is complete, you will receive a copy of the abstract.

A major benefit of having your publications included in the database is that ERIC will greatly increase dissemination of your research. Every day thousands of people worldwide search the ERIC database on the Internet and CD-ROMs looking for timely information. Inclusion of your papers in the ERIC database does not prohibit you from submitting the same papers to professional journals or prevent you from copyrighting your materials.

To submit items, just send two copies of your publications, along with a completed reproduction release form for each title to ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, Attn: Acquisitions, 5207 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-5207. You can obtain the reproduction release form at http://eric.uoregon.edu/ReproductionRelease.html, or we’ll be happy to send you one.

For more information about submitting documents to our Clearinghouse, feel free to contact Alana Lines, Acquisitions Coordinator, at alines@eric.uoregon.edu or (800) 438-8841 x5.

Home Trends and Issues Hot Topics In-Process Abstracts Publications Directory of Organizations Search CEPM Web Site Links About CEPM